Milieu

11/04/2006

Where do you buy music?

Filed under: General, Resources — Alex @ 12:03 pm

Note: I thought I’d do something a little bit different for my 200th post, so here’s some free advertising for the online music stores I really love.

I discuss a lot of free music here, whether it be covered by a creative commons license or merely placed in the public domain. That’s not to say I don’t buy a lot of music, I buy more than ever. Of course, the decline of independent record stores means most people go as far as HMV and Virgin to buy their music. Luckily, the Internet has provided independent stores with a way to survive. And while I say survive, I actually mean kick ass.

Boomkat

Boomkat, based in Manchester, have been running for seven years now. I’ve been using them online for over two years, and they’ve never let me down. I’ve bought some really diverse stuff off them, and they source some of the most interesting contemporary music and electronica you can find in the UK. They recently started stocking the Buddha Machine and wrote a great editorial on it. In fact, their editorials get better every time. The latest is coverage of Fonal Records, written by Adam Park, in which he interviews Sami Sänpäkkilä and Paavoharju.

Boomkat have a flash-based preview jukebox, which you can leave on repeat with any tracks you find on the site. Only 2-3 tracks are generally accessible from any one release, but they’re high quality previews.

Juno

Juno are a dance music specialist who are based in London. They only show what’s in stock, so you don’t find something rare and get excited before noticing they don’t have it. It’s a policy that might work for you, although I suspect it confuses new users when they find something they want apparently doesn’t exist. Juno offers DJ specific material, collections of samples and breaks, as well as digital downloads:

You can buy downloads either on their own, or as part of a vinyl or CD order. The digital part of your order will be available to download as soon as you have completed the checkout process, and your vinyl or CDs will be despatched by mail within 24 hours.

Juno allow you to preview quite a lengthy slice of any track.

Bleep.com and Warpmart

Bleep.com is one of the best ways of filling up your new iPod: the tracks are cheap, high quality (they even specify how they encoded them), and they have no DRM! You’re free to copy tracks you buy to your iPod, phone, car, whatever you want.

Warpmart is Warp’s online CD/vinyl/t-shirt/DVD store. I’ve always found them to be quick, and you really need to keep an eye on their newsletter because they occasionally have exclusive pre-release deals for Warp artists. I’ve got a few nice extras with Boards of Canada releases off Warpmart.

BeatPick

BeatPick is the most unique site of the bunch, with creative commons music available for purchase. They want you to use their music for your non-commercial projects, and there’s no DRM. They’re trying to do digital music distribution in a fair way, and succeeding. I recently wrote areview of BeatPick which profiles them in more detail.

More?

Leave a comment if you have an independent music specialist you love, I’d love to hear about more!

24/03/2006

BeatPick

Filed under: General, Music, Resources — Alex @ 4:05 pm

BeatPick is a new digital distribution label based in London that sells Create Commons licensed music. The earnings are split with artists 50/50, and many artists on the label also use other distribution methods such as CDBaby. Therefore, BeatPick are trying to be a label, but in a fair way - both to the artist and consumer.

You might have seen the recent press Apple have got because French politicians disagree with the way their DRM (Digital Rights Management) restricts consumers to Apple’s iPods. Labels such as BeatPick (and Bleep) release music as MP3 with no DRM, allowing you to stick their commercial releases on your mobile phone, non-Apple MP3 player, or anything else.

The slight difference between BeatPick and Bleep is a little thing called Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5, a Creative Commons license. This means you are free to make non-commercial derivative works (remixes for your mates), play at parties, and copy as much as you like. You can burn CDs or put it on all your MP3-capable licenses, no strings attached. As long as you’re not making money off the work and you state who produced the work, you’re on the right side of the law.

Why is this a good thing? Well, if you have a modern mobile phone, you might have found music purchased on the iTunes Music Store doesn’t work with it, because of the DRM. Apple had to do this to keep the big labels happy. BeatPick is explicitly allowing you to do this kind of thing by applying the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license - to keep the people that really matter happy. Another reason this license is good is that if you’re producing work that uses a BeatPick artist’s music, such as a video, presentation or perhaps a flash animation - you don’t need to pay a license fee if the work is non-commerical. It seems a little ridiculous to make it illegal for children making presentations at school to pay for a license for the music used, but in theory in many cases they should. This license is very clearly saying, ‘yes! Why should we ask you for money if you’re not out to make money off our artists?’

An added bonus of labels like BeatPick is they have an aesthetic opinion. Most people simply don’t have time to surf archive.org for music - not that I’m in any way knocking archive.org, but labels sometimes exist as an efficient filter for talent. A cursory listen of the content on BeatPick featured artists demonstrating high production values, talent and originality. I’m currently listening to Stucco Skies, a blend of funk and rock that’s turning my Friday afternoon into an early weekend.

Since BeatPick is using Creative Commons to support artists, I’ll be covering them more in the future, reviewing artists that pique my interest. What really interested me was the way they’ve used a Creative Commons license to try and be fair to consumers and artists - many similar labels advertise the fact they are fair to artists, but BeatPick are legally committed to be fair to all.

20/03/2006

Out Records - The Winter Transmitter

Filed under: Downloads, General, Music, Resources — Alex @ 4:51 pm

Out Records, based in San Diego, are a none genre specific label with an interesting policy on MP3 releases. Depending on the artist’s wishes, they release albums as hard copies for a year, then make them available for download as MP3. I emailed them with some questions about their background:

We put out music we enjoy and feel fits the integrity of the label. More so we look for good people to work with. Talent is everywhere but finding artists with heart is what’s golden for us.

The name “Out” was coined after jazz musicians saying a music piece is a bit off or ‘out’, when refering to music is off a given scale. We enjoy everything from a well composed 12 note scale piece to strange off the wall sound collages and everything in between. There is no reason to stop at any one style.

One of Out Records’ recent releases that caught my attention is the compilation ‘The Winter Transmitter.’ This contains a collection of tracks which all fit into a coherent aesthetic junction of icy ambience. M. Mehdi’s You Always Run Away Why Not This Time Just Stay Away is one of the highlights, with elements of drone and electronica at work. The Solstice Signal, also featuring M. Mehdi (and The Ambient Ohm) is superb, and since this is performed live it seems to have an unusual and perhaps jazz-inspired quality that you don’t usually find in ambient records. You could fall asleep to it, put it on at a party at 2am, or even travel back in time to give it John Peel to play after a 30 minute Orb session.

Le Lune Rouge by Minuit is another delicious slice buried within this compilation, it leads into Outside My Kitchen Window, but it feels unique and very apt in the collection. Contempt For The Contemporary (another Mehdi track), aside from the connotations of the title, reminds me of our abstract ambient friends at Webbed Hand Records.

Eternal Recurrence by XIV does sound recursive, with a synthetic arpeggio of sorts cycling through several levels of evolution.

This compilation contains everything from electronica and ambience to disturbing soundscapes, and the excellent Untitled Track by Ignatius will leave you wanting more from Out. Since they said they’re releasing more MP3s in the future, check them out. You won’t find them on archive.org, so go and dig around on their site: http://www.outrecords.com/

07/02/2005

Glitch Aesthetics - Iman Moradi

Filed under: Downloads, General, Resources, Visual arts — alex @ 12:06 pm

Glitch Aesthetics by Iman Moradi is the first formal study of glitch art that I’ve read. Moradi discusses glitch aesthetics, motivations and themes, as well as the relationship between glitch art and other movements and artists, such as Seurat, Mondrian and cubism.

“Leonardo Da Vinci insisted that ‘that painter who has no doubts will achieve little’, and he advised artists to seek out inspirations for their paintings in the stains on walls”

There’s also a formal discussion of the art of accidents, computational aesthetics and the fetishism of glitch art. In summarising the techniques used, the following techniques are explored:

  • Replication/repetition
  • Linearity
  • Fragmentation
  • Complexity

Those of you who are interested in this kind of art will appreciate the overview of prominent artists in the field. including Beflix who is helping Moradi create a book on the subject. This paper and the forthcoming book could be an excellent resource for artists and students who wish to explore this field academically, and Moradi states in the conclusion that there needs to be more formal discussion of glitch art.

I created the image above by damaging jpeg files containing an image of the Amiga’s boot screen, after reading some of the techniques used by artists in this paper.

04/02/2005

A short guide to releasing music on netlabels

Filed under: General, Resources — alex @ 11:44 am

1. Mastering

Generally, tracks should be mastered so they have consistent levels with respect to each other. Normalising to 0db is definitely not advised: some players or burning software may think the audio has clipped, or they may even boost the sound slightly and cause it to clip (iTunes can do this under certain circumstances when Sound Check is on).

I’ve never heard of netlabels mastering material. In my experience they release what’s given to them. I really think the larger labels should consider finding a generous soul to master tracks for them.

If you have to master your own work, start with a good audio editor, filters, equalizers and compressors. There’s a lot of free software and open source software to help you, as well as cheap commercial software that does a good job. If you’re using a Mac, Apple give you some basic AudioUnits which you can use as well.

Here’s some free and cheap tools I recommend:

DSP Quattro - a cheap, easy to use audio editor.

Audacity - an open source audio editor.

The Blockfish compressor - this can actually work well for creating subtle saturation in your mixes, it’s also a very easy to use compressor and it’s free.

Here are some articles to get you started:

Computer Music Magazine’s article on mastering.

Bob Katz has papers online, and is generally considered an authoritative figure on the subject.

2. Presentation

ID3 tags are something that is inherently important to the medium. If your tags are messy and inconsistent this may actually cause people to listen to your music less, as it gets lost in their collection and becomes hard to find. Keep genres sensible and the album and artist name consistent.

There’s no denying people like covers. Recently, I’ve noticed a lot of labels using beautiful photographic covers to compliment their work. If you have to prepare a cover yourself, keep it simple. Some kind people make CDs for their friends to share your work, so consider putting URLs on the covers and make everything legible.

3. Don’t forget your audience

Your audience is playing music on their computers, portable players or burning it to CD. Make their lives easier by keeping tracks sensible lengths and not using hidden tracks. You may want to consider breaking up your 60 minute ambient drone into movements, this makes it easier to download and has several other benefits for iPod users, although I understand if you don’t wish to do this.

Hidden tracks: a huge gap of silence then the band running about drunk in Dublin throwing up. This will only serve to annoy people who are listening to playlists of 10,000 songs. Suddenly, during the commute, they realise they’ve been listening to silence for 5 minutes thanks to your ‘amusing’ hidden track. This just doesn’t work unless you actually want to annoy people, or perhaps pull a John Cage.

Remember, the most popular portable music player is the iPod, which loads parts of songs in memory off the disk. The iPod’s cache, and battery, generally works best with smaller tracks. See this Apple tech note for more information.

4. Formats

Releasing different versions of your music to suit people with less bandwidth is useful, but people get confused with too many options, and most don’t care about your esoteric copyleft encoded format. If you’re going to offer Ogg, FLAC or any other non-MP3 format, make sure you describe what this format is and what it will play on. Conversely, a lot of open source software advocates are highly aware of the availability of free content and the plight of sites like archive.org, so providing them with formats like Ogg that suit their niche may be beneficial.

12/01/2005

Singing Sand Dunes: The Mystery of Desert Music

Filed under: Downloads, General, Phonography, Resources — Alex @ 8:08 am

I found Singing Sand Dunes: The Mystery of Desert Music on the Phonography mailing list:

Andreotti was able to detect surface waves on the sand that emanated from the avalanche at a relatively slow speed of about 130 feet per second (40 meters per second). In this way, the face of the dune acts like a huge loudspeaker – with the waves on the surface producing the sound in the air.

Bruno Andreotti’s homepage has more information, with recordings of the singing dunes.

17/12/2004

What’s your Experimental Album Of The Year?

Filed under: General, Music, Resources — Alex @ 11:06 am

On the BBC’s experimental music site they’ve recommended: Icarus, ‘I Tweet The Birdy Electric’, Fennesz, ‘Venice’ and Art Bears, ‘The Art Box’. Some of the people who have posted their personal favourites for 2004 are much more in tune with my own tastes.

16/12/2004

Sounds from Burundi

Filed under: Downloads, General, Music, Phonography, Resources, To do — Alex @ 10:48 am

My friend Todd was in Burundi a few years back reporting on yet another war there. He brought a little dictaphone with him and made a whole bunch of mini-recordings of interviews, music and the sounds of war. I recently listened to his “best of” CD of these recordings and picked a few of my favourites for the site.

The most interesting, in my opinion, are Burundian president Buyoya’s little speeches…

I found this weblog post yesterday, that strangely coincides with political debates I’ve been having recently. My argument was that the old style of investigative journalism that seems to have died will come back in full force with native people reporting on the situation in their own countries using modern technology. I’m well aware that not everyone has access to such expensive technology (or even electricity), but since the media and politicians continue to gloss over events in so called ‘civilized’ countries, things may begin to change.

09/12/2004

Kim Hiorthøy interview

Filed under: General, Music, Phonography, Resources — Alex @ 11:22 am

There’s an interesting interview with Kim Hiorthøy at Milkfactory, with a few surprises. In a way, it’s worth reading just for his attitude.

For The Ladies is a rather daring record. How did the idea for it come up, and what have the reactions to it been like?

I don’t remember now how the idea actually surfaced, I thought about it for a very long time before I actually made it. I think at some point I just thought it would be fun to make a strictly field-recordings only record. I haven’t gotten so many reactions. There have been a couple of butcherings by journalists, but that’s about it.

19/11/2004

Ryoji Ikeda and Ars Electronica articles

Filed under: Digital Art, General, Interactive Art, Music, Resources, Visual arts — Alex @ 10:49 am

Contemporary Magazine has two articles online that particularly interested me: Ryoji Ikeda and an overview of Ars Electronica.

This discussion of Ikeda’s reflections on technology, nature and philosophy are indicative of our current cultural situation, which I often consider as a renaissance. This is partly due to the way the Internet has changed art by decreasing the barrier to distributing your own work: it’s as if we’re experiencing a cultural rebirth without even realising it (perhaps blinded by the technological fetishists and practical applications):

Video images of landscapes are progressively abstracted into a language of data, while fragments of text punctuate the onscreen projections, blurring the lines between nature, science and philosophy. This is both image and anti-image, abstraction and absolute representation, the transformation of the image into pure maths, yet at the same time creating a new aesthetic.

The article on Ars Electronica is particularly apt in light of my current explorations in software art. Some of the comments are representative of “digital art” as a whole, in that it is becoming less self involved and more contemplative:

If the symposium felt a little stuck, this year’s many exhibitions made it clear that digital art has turned a corner. The best works consciously distanced themselves from the whizz-bang obsession with technology itself, moving towards a more contemplative vision, where technology served as an invisible vehicle for pure aesthetic experience.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress